Sophia Perennis

Sophia Perennis

Epistemology as an Ideal Norm: A Reflection on Suhrawardi's Criticism of Avicenna's Epistemology

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Mustafa Zali
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran
10.22034/iw.2025.493901.1817
Abstract
The Peripatetic conception of knowledge is based on essentialism. This strong realist conception of knowledge has faced serious criticisms. One of the most important criticisms of this view has been raised by Suhrawardi. According to Suhrawardi’s criticisms of Avicenna, human perception is primarily based on sensory encounters with the external world. Furthermore, one can never be certain that the entirety of an essence is comprehended by human perception. Therefore, it seems that despite the initial conception, accepting an essentialist epistemic realism does not suffice in explaining knowledge. This paper argues that the response to this challenge lies in understanding the nature of classical epistemology: classical epistemology seeks to outline an ideal of knowledge, always assessing actual human knowledge in relation to this ideal. Therefore, although the comprehension of the intelligible essences of objects is considered a difficult task, it remains an epistemic ideal for assessing the actual human knowledge.
Keywords
Suhrawardi
Avicenna
Essentialism
Epistemology
Subjects
Anth: Kant, Immanuel (2006). Anthropology ftom a Pragmatic Point of View, Trnaslated and Edited by Robert B. Louden, New York: Cambridge University Press.
CPR: Kant, Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason, Trnaslated and Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W.Wood, New York: Cambridge University Press.
G & CPrR: Kant, Immanuel (1996). Practical Philosophy, Trnaslated and Edited by Mary.J Gregor, New York: Cambridge University Press.
CJ: Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment, Trnaslated and Edited by Paul Guyer Eric Matthews, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Prol: Kant, Immanuel (1997). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Trnaslated and Edited by Gary Hatfield, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1992). Lectures on Logic, Trnaslated and Edited by Michael Young, New York: Cambridge University Press.
ثانویه
Allison, Henry E. (2011). Kant’s “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.
Beck, Lewis White (1960). A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Descartes, Rene (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol 2., trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, Paul (2007). Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide, continuum.
Kleingeld, Pauline (2010). Moral consciousness and the ‘fact of reason’, Edited by Andrews Reath and Jens Timmermann ,In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason A Critical Guide, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Michael H. McCarthy (1976). Analytic method and Analytic Propositions in Kant's Groundwork. Dialogue, 15, pp 565-582.
Prauss, Gerold (2009): Reason Practical in Its Own Right, Edited by Karl Ameriks and Otfried Höffe, In Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Puls, Heiko (2014). Quo errat demonstrator – warum es in der Grundlegung eine Faktum-These gibt. Drei Argumente gegen Dieter Schöneckers Interpretation, Hrsg von Heiko Puls, im Deduktion oder Faktum? , Berlin: De gruyter.
Schönecker, Dieter, (2009). The Transition from Common Rational Moral Knowledge to Philosophical Rational Moral Knowledge in the Groundwork, Edited by Karl Ameriks and Otfried Höffe,  In Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.
Schönecker, Dieter, (2014). Warum es in der Grundlegung keine Faktum-These gibt. Drei Argumente, Hrsg von Heiko Puls, im Deduktion oder Faktum? , Berlin: De gruyter.
Steigleder, Klaus (2023). Kants »Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten« Ein einführender Kommentar, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Timmermann, Jens, (2007). Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”: A Commentary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen W./ Schönecker, Dieter, (2015). Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals A Commentary, Translated by Nicholas Walker, Harvard University Press.