Sophia Perennis

Sophia Perennis

Hegel`s Logic: Metaphysical or non-metaphysical interpretation?

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of philosophy, University of Isfahan
Abstract
Hegel's logic has been interpreted in different ways so far, generally divided into two types: metaphysical and non-metaphysical encounters. In this article, based on what Hegel himself says about his logic and his intended purpose, we will first try to elucidate Hegel's goal in that part of his philosophical system. Then we will try to explain the interpretative standpoints of two of the most prominent Hegel scholars, namely Robert Pippin and Stephen Houlgate, and elucidate the differences between these two interpretative approaches to find out what is it that separates their approaches toward Hegel`s logic. Finally, relying on Hegel's insistence on systematic thinking, and the relation between the Phenomenology of Spirit and Logic as the first two major parts of his system, we will try to show which interpretive approach can clarify Hegel's philosophical project as a whole better.
Keywords
Subjects

Immanuel Kant, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Herausgegeben von Karl Vorländer, Hamburg, Verlag von Felix Meiner, 1962.
 
(Ak)  Immanuel Kant, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, (1785), Kant's Gesammelte Schriften, Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preussishen Akademie der Wissenchaften, Erste Abteilung: Werke, Band IV, S, 385-463, Berlin Druck und Verlag von Georg Reimer, 1903.
 
(A)    Immanuel Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Erthics, Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, (in: Kant's Critique of Pratical Reason and other Works on the Theory of Erhics, London, 1873), Tenth Edition, New Impression, London, Longmans, 1969.
 
(P)     Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Methphysic of Morals, Translated and Analysed by H. J. Paton, (in: The Moral Law or Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphsic of Morals, London, 1948), First Harper Torchbook Edition, New York, Harper & Row, 1964.
 
(B)     Immanuel Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Translated with an Introduction by Lewis White Beck, (in: Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, Chicago, 1949), New York, Macmillan, 1985.
 
(F)     Immanuel Kant, Metaphysical Foundations of Morals, Translated by Carl J. Friedrich, (in: The Philosophy of Kant - Immanuel Kant’s Moral and Political Writings, Edited with an Introduction by Carl J. Friedrich, New York, The Modern Library, 1949, pp. 140-208).
 
(D)    Immanuel Kant, Fondements de la métaphysique des Moeurs, traduction de Victor Delbos, revue par A. Philonenko, avec une introduction et des notes nouvelles, Paris, J. Vrin, 1980.
 
 (M)
امانوئل کانت، تأسیس میتافیزیقاالاخلاق، ترجمه و قدم له و علق علیه الدکتور عبدالغفار مکاوی، راجع الترجمة الدکتور عبدالرحمن بدوی، الهیئة المصریة العامة للکتاب، الطبعة الثانیة، 1980.
 
(MZ) Immanuel Kant, The Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Ethics, Translated with an Introduction by Otto Manthey-Zorn, New York, D. Appleton-Century Co. Inc., 1938.
 
(S)     Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Ethics, Translated by J. W. Semple, (in: the Metaphysic of Ethics, Translated by J. W. Semple, Edited with and Introduction by the Rev. Henry Calderwood, Third Edition, Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark, 1871, pp. 1-178).
 
(G)    Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Translated and Edited by Mary Gregor, with an Introduction by Christine M. Korsgaard, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
 
(E)     Immanuel Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals with On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns, Translated by James W. Ellington, Indianapolis / Cambridge, Hacket Publishing Company Inc., (second edition, 1981), third edition, 1993. This edition was not utilized in the Persian translation.