Aristotle's Rationalism :A Reply to Barnes

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی


گروه فلسفه . دانشکده علوم انسانی . دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی . واحد تهران شمال. تهران. ایران.



Aristotle is more concerned with sensory perception and experience than philosophers before him, treating it as a kind of knowledge. It seems that the role he assigns to senses in knowledge acquisition does not qualify him as an Empiricist, although it does for some commentators. Now we should see if there is sufficient ground for the attribution of Rationalism to him. Now can we attribute Rationalism to him? And if yes, then in what sense and to what extent is he a Rationalist? To answer the question, I begin by considering components of Rationalism (and those of Empiricism, for that matter), that is, innate ideas and intuition, and then discuss Aristotle’s position regarding these components given his various works, particularly the last chapter of his Posterior Analytics and with the focus on nous. Since there have been different interpretations of this chapter of Posterior Analytics, I deal with exegeses by commentators such as Jonathan Barnes and their claims as they concern my claim in this paper.



Aristotle. (1975). Posterior analytics. Barnes Jonathan (translated with a commentary). Clarendon Press.
 ___ (1984).Posterior analytics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.___ (1984). On The Soul. . In The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.
 ____ (1984). Metaphysics. . In The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.
 ___ (1984).Nichomachean Ethics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.
 Berkeley, George (1881).A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & co.
 Bronstein David. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. Posterior
Analytics. Oxford Aristotle Studies. Oxford University Press.
 Descaretes, (1984), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Cottingham John, Stoothoff Robert and Murdoch Dougald (Trans), vol 1.2.3. Cambridge University Press. [CSM]
 Ferejohn Michael (2008)." Empiricism and First Principles of Aristotelian Science". In A companion to Aristotle. Anagnostopoulos (ed). Blackwell.
 Frede Michael. (1996)."Rationality of Aristotle", in Rationality in Greek Thought. Frede M. and Striker G. (eds). Clarendon Press. pp: 157-173.
 Hoshyar, Yassaman, 2009, “Dekārt va Īde-haye Fetrī (Descartes and Innate Ideas),” Shenakht, 1/61, pp. 175-204.
 Hoshyar, Yassaman, 2018, “Arastū va Mowzū-e Metaphysic (Aristotle and the Subject-Matter of Metaphysics),” Hekmat va Falsafeh,14(55), pp.207-226.
 Hume, David (2008). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Millican, Peter (ed & notes).New York: Oxford University Press.
 Locke John. (1999). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Pennsylvania State University. (First published 1690).
 Motahhari, Mortaza (1996), Sharh-e Mabsūt-e Manzūmah (2), in Majmū’eh Asār (Collection of Works), vol. 10. Tehran: Sadra Publications.
 Porphyry, Isagoge – Mediaeval Sources in Translation 16, E. Warren, trans. (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1975)
 Ross David. (1949). Aristotle's prior and posterior analytics, Oxford University Press. 1949.
 Taylor C.W. (1990)." Aristotle's Epistemology". In Epistemology. Everson Stephan (ed). Cambridge University Press.