Sophia Perennis

Sophia Perennis

Reasons for the Realization of Three Transformations in Mulla Sadra's Philosophical Understanding

Document Type : Original Article

Author
philosophy,
Abstract
Among philosophers, there are differing opinions regarding Mulla Sadra's philosophical approach. There is no doubt that Mulla Sadra for a period believed in the priority of essence and explicitly stated this. His assertion of priority of gradational existence is also certain. However, there is disagreement on whether he remained at this stage or also reached priority of personal existence (asalat-e wujud-e wahdat-e shakhsi), and which position represents Mulla Sadra's true and final stance. This article approaches the three stages of Mulla Sadra's philosophical development in two ways: one, by referring to Sadra's explicit statements on this subject; and two, by explaining the transformations based on these three stages in important topics such as causality, substance and accident, motion, knowledge, the one and the many, psychology, precedence and succession, and indeed in most philosophical discussions. This article considers both approaches to demonstrate the realization of these three stages.

Highlights

Extended Abstract

It is evident that Islamic philosophy has undergone a journey over many centuries, reaching its pinnacle in the transcendent philosophy of Ṣadrā. Numerous pieces of evidence indicate that Islamic philosophical discourse has evolved from the multiplicity of existence to unity within multiplicity (gradation) and, ultimately, to the personal unity of existence. Precisely delineating which discussions are according to the originality of nature, which according to the originality of existence of gradational oneness, and which on Ṣadrā’s more specific view—the personal oneness of existence—requires outlining the fundamental and overarching framework of each of these aforementioned stages. According to the originality of nature, natural multiplicity always indicates multiplicity in objective and external entities, since each of them hypothetically refers to a specific objective aspect (Mesbah, 1987, vol. 1, p. 321). However, as expressed by Ṣadrā, unity is coextensive with existence: wherever there is unity, existence is also present, and wherever there is existence, unity is realized. These two are coextensive in their application to things—whatever is called “existent” can also be called “one”, and they are alike in strength and weakness. The weaker its existence, the weaker its unity, and the stronger its existence, the stronger its unity. (Mulla Sadrā, 2003, vol. 1, p. 402; see also: Sajjādī, 2001, p. 520).

In the passages where Ṣadrā acknowledges his earlier advocacy for the originality of nature, he also refers to his transition from this essentialist perspective to an existence-centered (wujūd-centric) view. There is no doubt that his philosophy is fundamentally grounded on the originality of existence (aṣālat al-wujūd). Once affirming this principle, he employs the rule of gradation (tashkīk) to explain multiplicity. (Mulla Sadrā, 1981, vol. 2, p. 381). It is for this reason that this stage of his philosophical journey is termed the originality of existence of gradational oneness. Ultimately, Mulla Sadra's third philosophical journey is characterized by belief in the originality of existence of personal oneness, through which he addressed numerous philosophical and theological issues, bringing about a profound transformation in his philosophical discourse. Apart from the explicit distinctions made by Mulla Sadrā and the philosophers regarding the three journeys of the originality of nature, the originality of existence of gradational oneness and the originality of existence of personal oneness, the best evidence for the actualization of these three journeys lies in the discussions that can be shown to have evolved within the same subjects according to these three journeys. Significant transformations have occurred in numerous issues such as causality, essence and accident, movement, knowledge, oneness and multiplicity, psychology, tripartite division of being, precession and recency, the subject of philosophy, and more.

 The first journey is characterized by multiplicity as its essence; the second journey is marked by unity within multiplicity, while the third journey embodies pure and personal unity. Thus, the realization of all three journeys in Ṣadrā’s philosophy is certain, given the presented evidence. It is essential to deeply examine the evolution of discussions in other philosophical subjects when studying Islamic philosophy, particularly Ṣadrā’s wisdom.

 

 

Keywords

Subjects


References

The Holy Quran.
Ashtiyani, Jalal-ed-Din (1999), “Biography and Philosophical Thoughts of Mullā Ṣadrā”, Qom: Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary.
Ashtiyani, Mehdi, (2011), “Commentary on Sharh al-Mānzoumeh”, Qom: Ashtiyani Publications.
Assar, Mohammad Kazem, (1997), “Treatise on Unity of Existence”, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Babaei, Ali (2022), “The Issue of God, the Only Substance of Being: Development of Essence and Accident Based on Three Developmental Stages of Mulla Sadra's Philosophy”, Journal of Religious Thought, Vol.20, No.75.
Babaei, Ali (2022), “The Issues of Science according to Three Philosophical Journeys”, Essays in Philosophy and Theology, Vol.55, No.1.
Babaei, Ali, Mousawi, Seyyed Mukhtar (2020) “Three Motions based on Mullā Sadrā's Three Philosophical Journeys: Natural Motion, Substantive Motion, Renewal of Likes”, Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 16, No. 36.
Babaei, Ali; Mousawi, Seyyed Mukhtar (1401), “Three Motions based on Mullā Sadrā's Three Philosophical Journeys: Natural Motion, Substantive Motion, Renewal of Likes”, Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 16, No. 36.
Bahmanyar ibn al-Marzban, Abu al-Hasan (1996), “Kitāb al-Taḥṣīl”, ed by Morteza Motahhari, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Ebrahimi Dinani, Gholam Hossein (2001), “General Philosophical Rules in Islamic Philosophy”, Tehran: Research Institute of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies.
Elahi Ghomshei, Mahdi (1984), “Special and Common Divine Wisdom”, Tehran: Islamic Publications.
Fakhr Razi, Mohammad ibn Umar (2003), “Sharh al-Ishãrat wa al-Tanbîhat”, Tehran: Association of Cultural Works and Honors.
Ghasemiyan, Reza (2016), “A Comparative Study of the Erect Estance of Perceptual Forms to the Faculty of Perception according to Ibn Sina and Mullā Ṣadrā”, Ayîn Hekmat, Vol.27, No.1.
Haeri Yazdi, Mehdi (1982), “Knowledge and Evidence”, Tehran: Institute of Cultural Studies and Research.
Hosseini Tehrani, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein (1996), “Allāh-Shînāsi”, Mashhad: Allameh Tabatabai Publications, First Edition.
Ibn Sīnā, Hossein ibn Abdullah (1982), “al-Ishãrat wa al-Tanbîhat”, Qom: Bústan-e Kitab.
Ibn Sīnā, Hossein ibn Abdullah (1983), “Danishnama-i 'Ala'I”, Hamedan: Bu-Ali Sina University Press.
Ibn Sīnā, Hossein ibn Abdullah (1984), “al-Maābdā wa al-Ma`ad”, Tehran: Institute of Islamic Studies, University of Tehran - McGill University.
Ibn Sīnā, Hossein ibn Abdullah (1997), “Kitab al-Shîfa (Theology)”, Research by Allameh Hassanzadeh Amoli, Qom: Publication Center of Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary.
Javadi Amoli, Abdullah (2007), “Raḥiq Mākhtoum”, Qom: Isra Publications, First Edition.
Mesbah Yazdi, Mohammad Taqi, (1987), “Philosophy Education”, Tehran: Islamic Propaganda Organization.
Motahhari, Morteza (2004), “Collection of Works”, Tehran: Sadra.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1962), “al-Shawahid al-Rúbubiyyah”, Tehran: University Publication Center.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1981), “Hikmat Al Muta'alyah fi Ἇsfar al-‘aqliyya al-arba‘a”, Beirut: Dậr al-Ἇhyyậ.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1984), “al-M`afatîh al-Qãyb”, Tehran: Institute of Hikmat and Philosophy of Iran.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1987), “al-Shawahid al-Rúbubiyyah”, Beirut: Institute of Arab History.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1989), “Hikmat Al Muta'alyah fi Ἇsfar al-‘aqliyya al-arba‘a”, Qom: al-Mustafawi Publications.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (1999), “al-Maābdā wa al-Ma`ad”, Tehran: Institute of Hikmat and Philosophy of Iran.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (2001), “al-Maābdā wa al-Ma`ad”, trans by Zabihi, Qom: Qom University Press.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (2003), “Sharh al-Shîfa”, Tehran: Institute of Islamic Hikma of Sadra.
Mullā Ṣadrā, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (2006), “Ittihad al-‘Aquil wa’l-Ma’qul”, Tehran: Hikmat.
Mửnẩazah, Mehdi; Kavandi, Sahar (2017) “The Evolution of Mullā Ṣadrā from the Originality of the Existence of Gradation Oneness to the Originality of the Existence of Personal Oneness”, Journal of Hikmat Sadraei, Vol.5, No.2
Sabzevari, Mullah Hadi, (1990) “Explanation of the Manzomeh”, Tehran: Nashr-e Naab
Sajjadi, Jafar, (2001), “Dictionary of Philosophical and Theological Sciences”, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Tabatabai, Mohammad Hossein (2005), “Scientific and Objective Tāwhid in Religious and Mystical Schools”, Mashhad, Islamic Publications.
Tabatabai, Mohammad Hossein (2007), “The Endless of Creation”, Qom: Bústan-e Kitab.
Tabatabai, Mohammad Hossein (2009), “al-Qûwā wa al-Fîl”, Qom: al-Baqqiyāt.
Tabatabai, Mohammad-Hossein (1981), “Nihāyat al-Hikmah”, Qom: Publication Center of Islamic Propaganda Office of Qom Seminary.
Tabatabai, Mohammad-Hossein (2008), “al-Risalāh fi Ilm”, Qom: Bústan-e Kitab.
Zanuzi, Abdullah (1999), “Anwar al-Jāliyāh”, Tehran: Amir Kabir