Analysis and comparison of four interpretations of the Nicomachean Ethics

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine four different approaches to the interpretation of the Nicomachean Ethics, focusing on the habituation, and finding the answer to the question of why and how the repetition of practices attributed to a virtue can gradually create that virtue in human beings. First, according to the division of the soul into the spirited (the will), the appetitive, and the rational parts, attributed to Plato, it is claimed that the interpretations of the Nicomachean Ethics have focused on each of these parts. So, we could also categorize them into three groups. Since the Nicomachean Ethics is the most important source of Muslim philosophers in philosophical ethics, Akhlagh-e-Nasseri is intended as a reading of the Nicomachean Ethics and it is shown how and why Khajeh Nasir Tusi prefers the will part. Then in the appetitive reading, it is highlighted Burnyeat's interpretation, and in the rational reading Sorabji's interpretation. Then, by the internal and external critiques of these three interpretive approaches, and by using the interpretation of Nancy Sherman, we ultimately attempt to present a coherent and comprehensive interpretation of habituation in the Nicomachean Ethics that is safe to the critiques of previous interpretations. In this accepted interpretation, there is a strong link between emotion and cognition in order to interpret the habituation as a critical practice.

Keywords

References

-         طوسی، نصیرالدین، اخلاق ناصری، به تصحیح مجتبی مینوی و علیرضا حیدری، انتشارات خوارزمی، تهران، 1356.
-         کاپلستون، فردریک، تاریخ فلسفه: یونان و روم، ترجمۀ جلال‌الدین مجتبوی، شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی، تهران، 1375.
-         کانت، ایمانوئل، تعلیم و تربیت: اندیشه‌هایی دربارۀ آموزش و پرورش، ترجمۀ غلامحسین شکوهی، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران، 1374.
 
-        Aristotle (1980) The Nicomachean Ethics (NE), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-        Aristotle (1998) Politics (Pol), translated by C.D.C. Reeve, Hackett Publishing Company.
-        Burnyeat, M. F. (1980). “Aristotle on Learning to Be Good”, in Essays on Aristotle`s Ethics, Edited by Amelie Oksenberg Rorty, University of California Press.
-        Drummond, Ian Christopher (2016). John Duns Scotus on the Role of the Moral Virtues, a thesis in Department of philosophy in University of Toronto, Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/72964/1/Drummond_Ian_C_201606_PhD_thesis.pdf
-        Mertz Hsieh, Diana (2002). “The Habits of Aristotle”, Retrieved fromhttp://www.philosophyinaction.com/docs/thoa.pdf
-        Sherman, Nancy (1999). “Character development and Aristotelian virtue”, in Virtue Ethics and Moral Education, edited by David Carr and Jan Steutel, London and New York: Routledge, pp 35-50.
-        Sherman, Nancy (1999b). “The Fabric of Character” in Aristotle’s Ethics. Edited by Nancy Sherman. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
-        Sherman, Nancy (1989). The Fabric of Character: Aristotle`s  Theory of Virtue, Oxford: Oxford  University Press.
-        Sorabji, Richard (1980). “Aristotle  on the Role of Intellect in Virtue” in Essays on Aristotle`s Ethics, Edited by Amelie Oksenberg Rorty, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
-        von Wright, Georg Henrik (1963). The Varieties of Goodness, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd Broadway House.
-        Winge, Colin (2006). Moral Education Beyond the Teaching Right and Wrong, Springer.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics